Modeling the Race Discussion
Mike Huckabee takes Obama's lead and continues to model for America how we can begin to talk about race in this country. Huckabee would have been so good, for the Republican party. I have immense respect for him. Here is what he said:
... One other thing I think we've got to remember: As easy as it is for those of us who are white to look back and say, "That's a terrible statement," I grew up in a very segregated South, and I think that you have to cut some slack. And I'm going to be probably the only conservative in America who's going to say something like this, but I'm just telling you: We've got to cut some slack to people who grew up being called names, being told, "You have to sit in the balcony when you go to the movie. You have to go to the back door to go into the restaurant. And you can't sit out there with everyone else. There's a separate waiting room in the doctor's office. Here's where you sit on the bus." And you know what? Sometimes people do have a chip on their shoulder and resentment. And you have to just say, I probably would, too. I probably would, too. In fact, I may have had a more, more of a chip on my shoulder had it been me.Mike is also modeling for us exactly what Obama's speech implored us to do with regard to Rev. Wright and the issue of Race. We can't throw a person under the bus because of the way they express their feelings about race and justice based on their experiences. White or black. To do so would be to miss the point of Obama's speech on race. That's why Obama didn't disown Rev. Wright. He repudiates, disagrees with, and condemns Rev. Wright's statements, but he still loves him and accepts him as a mentor. Why, because four clips on YouTube don't make the sum total of a person who has dedicated forty years of serving Jesus on behalf of the poor and disenfranchised. And people who experienced a kind of racism that might be somewhat foreign to my generation still have the right to see the world through their experiences, even if that world has and continues to change.
Besides Christians shouldn't be so taken aback by Rev. Wright's statements. I mean have you read Amos or Jeremiah lately? They make Rev. Wright look like a softy.
Obama has kicked the race discussion to the next generation who has experienced a different society than the previous generation has with regard to gender and race. Regardless of what happens in this election, Obama has changed the frame work and ground rules of the discussion. What a great new place to be in. I couldn't be more proud to be supporting him for President. Who would have a thought, a national leader calling us to a nuanced and imperfect discussion on a difficult topic. Feels good to not have to be so "black and white."
Finally, Nicolas Kristof had this great line in his editorial:
What should draw much more scrutiny in this campaign than any pastor’s sermons is the candidates’ positions on education, health care and poverty — and their ability to put those policies in place. Cutting off health care benefits for low-income children strikes me as much more offensive than any inflammatory sermon.I am eager for that debate between Obama and McCain.
3 comments:
But Wright is an extremist and a hater of America! Would you be so kind to McCain if his pastor said "God d--- America" ?
David, as always thanks for commenting. I appreciate the opportunity to dialog with you about this.
I am not going to defend Wright's statements. For one I don't know the full context in which they were made so commenting on them would be a little disingenuous. It appears as though some of the media is starting to apply some context as well, check out Anderson Cooper's blog.
Two, his comments don't really surprise me. Prophetic preaching and Liberation Theology are very focused on the plight of the oppressed compared to the oppressor. It's Amos and Jeremiah type stuff, which is pretty bold and when applied to America might not be so pretty. Especially within the context of comparing it with the Kingdom of God, which we would agree far exceeds anything America or any other nation could ever hope to be.
With regard to McCain...I would be as kind (I really like and respect McCain). John Hagee, who I think has one of the worst Christian theologies endorsed McCain. That's fine for him to do I don't think that McCain agrees with Hagee, in fact I know he doesn't.
Same with Obama. Wright brought him to Christ and served as major influence in his life. And guess what, Obama loves America. He is running to be President and gave an inspired and inclusive speech on race. Obama has a completely different take on America and the chance for race relations to change than Wright has seemed to express.
Rev Wright isn't running for president. Everyone close to Obama is not going to be a mirror image or even necessarily a close approximation to all that he believes or represents. Billy Graham's daughter, Pat Robertson, and others made similarly harsh and upsetting statements against America after 9/11 on the basis of their issues, prayer in schools, homosexuality, and not enough Christianty in the socio-political context of the US. Rev Wright was speaking through his issues and experiences as well. I vehemently disagree with the conclusions of all these spiritual leaders but I follow the emotional reaction of Rev Wright more easily than that of Graham, Robertson and Falwell. To me, bearing the consequence of centuries of oppresion and hatred outwieghs that of school prayer or the desire to ensure we continue to deny rights to Americans who happen to be gay.
Post a Comment