J-Wild

Monday, March 17, 2008

It's a Boy!...And You're Going to Jail.

"A day after she gave birth in 2006, Tiffany Hitson, 20, sat on her front porch crying, barefoot and handcuffed. A police officer hovered in the distance. Ms. Hitson’s newborn daughter had traces of cocaine and marijuana in its system, and the young woman, baby-faced herself, had fallen afoul of a tough new state law intended to protect children from drugs, and a local prosecutor bent on pursuing it. She made arrangements for the baby’s care, and headed off to a year behind bars.

Over an 18-month period, at least eight women have been prosecuted for using drugs while pregnant in this rural jurisdiction of barely 37,000, a tally without any recent parallel that women’s advocates have been able to find.

There has not been a murder here [Andalusia, Alabama] in over three years, the prosecutor said. But a year ago a newborn died at the local hospital, and the mother had traces of methamphetamines in her system. Doctors told the police that the infant’s premature birth could be attributed to maternal drug use, and she was charged with “chemical endangerment of child,” which carries a sentence of 10 years to life in prison.
This article made my jaw drop and made me angry. I am sure that the police and prosecutors are having a hard time stopping illegal meth labs in their county so they punish the families of addicts to appear as though they are accomplishing something in their little corner of the drug war. It's clear from police affidavits that doctors, police, prosecutors, judges, and social workers all collaborate to send these women off to county jails, state prisons, or drug rehab clinics. What do you think that does to the doctor/patient relationship? Who are these women supposed to go to in order to get help if they wanted to kick their addictions for themselves and their unborn babies! One OBGYN in Oklahoma said in an editorial for The Oklahoman that these prosecutions are actually pushing women to have abortions rather than risk arrest for a bad outcome during a delivery (link).

The prosecutor Greg L. Gambril just looks like a jerk and his comments in the article don't really do much to change that perception. Look drugs are awful and do horrible things to families, children, and entire communities. Unfortunately the state has to get involved in order to protect chilren. But sending these women most of whom are young, poor, uneducated, and jobless to prison isn't the answer. My sister is a social worker extraordinaire and I can guarantee you that in thirty minutes she could come up with much more effective, efficient, and cheaper ways to help these women break their drug use AND become better mothers in the process. Unfortunately the paternalistic tendencies of the south and the unforgiving nature of the religious environment of these small towns have worked to oppress these women who need help more than they need punishment.

It might be easy to regard this kind of prosecutorial overreaching as a rural southern phenomenon, but you would be wrong. The National Advocates for Pregnant Women [NAPW] have been documenting the increasingly punitive laws aimed at women who deliver babies with drugs in their systems. These cases are disturbing because of the lengths the state can go to separate mothers from their newborn children, and punish women based more on assumptions of causality rather than a direct scientific evidence.

Let me say, I am not advocating that women who deliver babies with drugs in their systems shouldn't have any intervention. They should have intervention. But jail isn't an intervention, it's a tool that's used to punish and keep people segregated who are a menace to society. These women need a hand up not a lock-down.

6 comments:

erinlo said...

Jason- This is a subject that hits very close to home for my family. As you know, I have an adopted brother and sister that were exposd to drugs and alcohol in utero and both (now in their late teens) suffer long term consequences. Not only because of the drugs, but because these kids ended up in the "system" and were passed around to so many different people, they never learned how to attach to one primary care giver.

Their birth mother was given chance after chance to get her act together and never did. Because she was given so many chances, my brother and sister lived in a constant state of limbo the first three years of their lives. The consequences for them have been devastating.

I have thought about how different their lives would be had the mother not been given so many chances. What if after the first or second offense, Des and Jas were put in a permanent foster home?? What if they had not been passed around from family to family- from home to home? How different would their lives and the lives of my parents be?

I agree with you that we need to show compassion and love these mothers, Jason. But it should NOT be at the expense of the child. I hate what my brother and sister have been through. I hate that someone did not advocate for THEM! The "system" was so bent on giving their mother chance after chance. I'm glad that mothers are being given less chances because in the long run I think it's the children who suffer the most.

J-Wild said...

Erin, thank you so much for sharing.

Ugh..that just makes my heart hurt. Adults fail children in so many ways. With broken families, poor health care and education, and the foster care system being just the tip of the iceberg. I appreciate the difficulty authorities find themselves in when trying to address the needs of these mothers AND their children at the same time. A damned if you do and damned if you don't situation to be sure. A question is where do we want them to hedge their bets? In favor of the mother getting her act together if given the proper resources to do so, or in removing the children for protection and punishment in hopes that the mother can remedy herself?

What if we could fund drug treatment programs the way we fund prisons? To incarcerate a non-violent drug offender in a state prison costs between $8,000 to $36,000 per year. To put that same person in mandatory drug rehab costs between $2,600 to $12,0000 per year. A savings of 3 to 1 (source).

I don't think these women should be given the "chance" to succeed. I also don't think they need our love or compassion. What they need is to be given the tools, support systems, and resources "TO" succeed in keeping clean and raising their children. I know you would agree that too much is at stake to let these women fail. Of course some will fail and the proper measures should be taken to protect those children. But I believe a vast majority of these troubled mothers and families want to be better, they just lack the skills to get there. While the state wastes it's resources by putting these mother's in jail, the church should step in and fill the gap.

Unknown said...

Erin brings up a great point. Traces of drugs can do irreparable harm but the harm done by instability in an infant/young child's life through removal and upheaval is far more likely to have far more extensive consequences for children. To me this supports intervention and NOT jail, this also supports reasonable time limits for parent rights (in NY its 15 months but usually gets extended to two years), and most importantly this supports doing everything we can do to find and uphold and honor foster parenting. Yes there are serious problems in the system but most of them come down to not having the foster parents willing and able to meet the needs of children. "Permanent" foster home is extraordinarily rare for a "drug baby" in our tri-state area, and in Abilene. The "fixes" to the lack of the essential need for committed and capable foster parents will always result in failing kids.

Thanks J - there are hundreds of more compassionate AND effective solutions for these families. Happily they are already working and changing things but there is a strong counter-movement to what they are trying to do as evidenced by the article. I am thankful I get to work with at least 7 programs right here in the city that are doing it better. But its not enough and we need to get these solutions on the road!

Unknown said...

Okay I wrote up a comment after reading the articles and getting my social work all worked up! These are my areas of practice, substance abuse and child welfare. I don't know what happened to my comment but perhaps its best I step back.

We must let go of our desire to punish and support solutions. But also, our society must pursue the support of fostering--real fostering--and adoption for children in need of parents. Even if we could do this as fiercely as we pursue the science, technology, money, access and health care coverage for people who want to be parents but only to biological children, we would make tremendous strides for the children already here and in need of caring.

erinlo said...

Wow, Elizabeth- I wish you had been my brother and sister's social worker!!!

I think I understand a little better what you are saying, Jason. I guess what I have a really hard time with is seeing these mothers as the victims, when perhaps they are just as much victims of the "system" as the children are. You have such a compassionate heart, Jason. I read the same article you read and honestly, thought- "good." Not because I want the mother to be punished, but because I want the child to be saved. Perhaps I should be looking at the situation from all angles- including the mother's.

Elizabeth- what a great point about "fostering" permanent foster homes. How could we, as a church, model this? How can we support those who are called to foster? How can we encourage people to be trained to foster?

I would be really curious to hear about the programs you are working with that really are working, Elizabeth. I will be honest- I'm a little skeptical- but I don't want to be!!!

chris b said...

I love this post but I love reading the comments more. You all make great comments and it is great to see everyone working on the same page (even if its saying different things). I have absolutely no experience here nor have I ever thought one second about it until I read this blog. It has left me with several questions. Can mothers be forced to seek treatment during pregnancy? Can churches somehow come from no where (which is where it sounds like they are right now) and help in some way? What effect does having mostly men in charge have on this situation (and others)? Why do we always want to punish first instead of try and get to heart of the issues?

I could go on but I won't. Great blog and great comments.